CP of schoolgirls

Posters who continually try to equate the punishment of schoolgirls for breach of school rules with some form of ‘Sexual gratification’ [Either for the recipient or the administrator] obviously have little or no knowledge of the reality of School CP during the Fifties and sixties when I attended school.

Firstly NOBODY [Boy or girl] had to be punished if they behaved! Behave and don’t break school rules and you were unlikely to ever be caned or receive any form of CP. It is worth noting that MANY pupils [Boy / girl] DID go through there entire school career without receiving the cane or any form of CP.

I have mentioned before often in such discussions that the notion of a ‘Headmaster’ thrashing the bared buttocks of a scantily clad female pupil who writhed and moaned ‘suggestively’ is pure fantasy and bears NO relation to properly administered CP by a teacher. Correctly administered CP is intended to be [And IS] a ‘discouraging experience’ which is very painful [And not in the remotest sense ‘erotic’!]. To those who would ‘Doubt the motives’ of the teacher applying the punishment. I would suggest that if they felt a member of teaching staff was unsuitable to administer such punishment, as he / she may receive ‘sexual gratification’ from performing such a duty, then in my opinion they are unsuitable to be in charge of children in any capacity!

There is absolutely no reason that a schoolgirl who breaks a school rule, for which the prescribed punishment is a canning, should not be equally treated and caned. Any ‘Shame and embarrassment’ she may feel, she has brought upon herself. [Boys are also subject to such feelings].

Normally either the Headmistress or a ‘senior’ female member of staff caned girls. However the schools ‘Headmaster’, for what were considered to be ‘Serious’ breaches of discipline, formally caned many girls and boys. This was accepted by pupils as punishment and they then [hopefully a little wiser] got on with there schooling and education.

CP should be re introduced into schools for the benefit of all! I will happily discuss this subject with any forum poster that holds ‘Genuine’ views on this subject.

 

The real purpose of the schools is to bully and manipulate children, i.e., human beings to obey authority. Teachers and authoritarians like to disguise this purpose with words like education, or more especially, “their/your/his education.” Schools up through undergraduate consider themselves to “in loco parentis” and therefore to have rights to sadistic treatment of students.
When we remember that ninety percent of all education, at least in the US, is government funded, we realize that we are paying sadists to warp the minds of us in our younger stages of life.
The hidden agenda of education must be altered to be truly education and the power to inflict any sort physical or emotional pain should be taken from teachers.
Then it will be we not authorities who control society.

 

The real purpose of the schools is to bully and manipulate children,
**You do not feel that ‘Imparting knowledge’ may be a key function of education?

i.e., human beings to obey authority.
</i> How could society exist if ALL had the freedom to disregard societies rules?

Teachers and authoritarians like to disguise this purpose with words like education, or more especially, “their/your/his education.”
<i> You appear to see ‘Education’ as a ‘Dark conspiracy’? To what end does this conspiracy serve?

Schools up through undergraduate consider themselves to “in loco parentis” and therefore to have rights to sadistic treatment of students.
</i> CP of students who Break school rules is NOT sadistic. It forms a neccesary means of punishment in order to maintain disciplin and deter ALL from breaking school rules and regulations.

When we remember that ninety percent of all education, at least in the US, is government funded, we realize that we are paying sadists to warp the minds of us in our younger stages of life.
<i> What is sadistic in administering CP as a ‘Discouraging experience’ for misconduct? [We are NOT talking here about Branding students with ‘Red hot irons’!!] A lesson learned by receiving a ‘Smacked bottom’ at school may well prevent a more serious lesson being learned latter on in life by a ‘Prison sentence!

The hidden agenda of education must be altered to be truly education and the power to inflict any sort physical or emotional pain should be taken from teachers.
</i> What ‘Hidden agenda’ do you refer to? [Maintenance of the ‘Rule of law?]

Then it will be we not authorities who control society.
<i> Who exactly is the ‘WE’ you refer to?

Your reasoned replies to my comments will be of interest. From my point of view you appear to make no ‘Reasoned argument’ against CP, Rather your belief in a society that does not have any discipline [or means of instilling it] is to say the least ‘Unworkable!

 

Hi ‘Steff’
A strange reply from an ‘Intelectual’ [your immplication?]such as yourself. Are you seriosly contending that a ‘Factual’ account of the reality of school CP is of little or no intrest on a forum such as this? I would enquire from you if you believe that you have the authority to speak for ALL contributors or possibly just yourself?If the groups level of communication and or debate is truly that of sexualy fantasised CP and dubiose attempts at erotic descriptions of immagined punishments then yes do please recommend a link to a group were reality is the ‘norm’! However I would be intrested first to see how many members REALY prefer the deluded sexual fantasies of errotic CP to a sensible account of the REAL ADMINISTRATION OF CP at a time when it was in general use.Sadly, the vast majority of people who haunt these boards [and I include myself] DO want “titillating information”. I do feel we should not delude ourselves – these boards, in the main, exist for the sexual pleasure of those who read, and post, theiron!Having read this [and Abby’s] board, I am simply unable to believe a lot of what is written – even in the “old days” people inflicting the type of punishments written of would have been in court and probably prison after that. I have always had a “bent” towards CP and love reading stories about it. Having said THAT, I would never condone some of the things writen about on this and other boards – they really are fantasy.EVERYONE on these boards should admit [if only to themselves!] their real motives for being here and act accordingly.

Even the “perfect” saarajane is kinky. Why on earth would a “normal” person be here at all?? “Normal” peolle are probably revolted by what they read here and would probably take steps to have it deleted. Hence Sarajane is really just a little too “perfect” – she’s as kinky as the rest of us.

Dear Mike,

In response to your remark “[A] strange reply from an ‘Intelectual’ [sic] (your immplication [sic]?) such as yourself” – a sentence, I might add, that is lacking subject – I would just add in reply that this is someone else’s observation; I ordinarily go by the title ‘failed academic’.

Any factual account of CP is indeed of “intrest [sic]” to us, so much so that were you actually to provide one we would take great delight in scrutinising its veracity.

Though I have only the authority to speak on behalf of myself and some admirers, I believe that I speak for the majority of contributors when I say that spankophiles have better things to discuss than serious arguments about whether schools should re-impose long-lost methods of child abuse that happen to coincide with our foremost sexual interest.

If you feel that the “groups [sic]” interest in “sexualy [sic] fantasised CP and dubiose [sic] attempts at erotic descriptions of immagined [sic] punishments” is not to your liking, you will be happy to know that a certain member’s member is currently guiding him to create a group where naughty little boys, bare bottoms, CP, and pants will be discussed non-sexually in exacting detail. I do not believe that you are on the banned list. Once a member you will indeed be treated to many sensible accounts of the “REAL ADMINISTRATION OF CP at a time when it was in general use”, and perhaps receive an embarrassing visit from law-enforcement officials, depending upon its pictorial content.

Hi Steff,

I was unaware that this forum was a place in which to discuss the grammatical [or otherwise] construction of sentences. That having been said, I also have NO idea [nor wish to have] as to your academic qualifications [Or lack of them?] I normally discuss topics with posters without the need to worry about there academic standing. To me the ‘Content’ of the post and its basis in fact or honest opinion is far more important than the niceties of correct sentence construction and or the academic standing of the poster!

It would appear to me from the part of your reply that read

“have better things to discuss than serious arguments about whether schools should re-impose long-lost methods of child abuse”

that factually you appear to have very little understanding of the use of parental or scholastic CP! You appear to be unable [or unwilling] to see the distinction between the necessary application of CP to instil discipline in a child who otherwise is allowed to believe that its ill behaviour IS socially acceptable. The truth is that a ‘Smacked bottom’ as punishment for misconduct IS remembered yet soon over. An undisciplined child growing in to an undisciplined adult WILL appear before the courts and eventually finish up with a criminal record that will blight his / her life forever! A fact that is ALWAYS ignored by the liberal ‘politically correct’ band of fools that would shape a child’s future solely to come within there narrow minded beliefs and NOT in the child’s best interest!

As to why you think I may be interested in what you appear to believe is a proposed ‘Paedophile’ group astonishes me. I will be interested in your response to my enquiry as to why a discussion on the REALITIES of CP should give you this opinion?

I will close by reminding you [Do I need to?] that it is a very poor means of debate, to attack the poster, because you really have no answer to the content of the post!