Seriously, from what you say, you would attempt to treat both sexes fairly so I won’t criticise that. You say girls should not be caned as hard, not because they’re girls but because, if your procedure were followed, they would have less protection. However, the relevant difference is that level of protection, not their sex. That’s fair enough but you also say you would be loath to cane a girl as hard as a boy so, by caning a girl on her knickers and a boy through his trousers, you justify caning her with less force. A lot of girls wear trousers for school now so, unless they have to take them down to be caned, there’s no justification for using less force. Also, at least one boy wore a skirt to school so your reasons should also apply to him. Sex is irrelevant, it’s what the child is wearing that counts.
SCHOOL CORPORAL PUNISHMENT11
-
Memories of Corporal Punishment19
The main case there was Campbell and Cosans (which WAS driven by STOPP), a Scottish tawse case which, when...
-
Mrs Wilkins99
On and on it went. At times, it was completely drowned out by the rain. Then it would reappear...
-
Enjoyable Canings5
ACES was explicitly and deliberately set up to fight what its members saw as a decline in educational standards...
-
Enjoyable Canings13
I graduated in the late 70s: in Britain ( winter of discontent, please turn out the lights etc.), at...
-
Corporal Punisment Memories School5
I was surprised because he’d never struck me as all that reticent when he was teaching me, but that...
-
School Sports team CP2
I can remember a couple of guys sent off in inter-house rugby matches, one of whom was dropped from...
-
The Cane in UK Schools82
Does it matter? It was a long time ago. No bones were broken; no blood (so far as I...
-
Sent for the Cane 3
When in Secondary school we were taught woodwork by one of the housemasters. One day one of the guys...