–in junior school, I think it is just acceptable if no other options were open. I DO NOT SEE WHY AT THE AGE OF 9 OR 10 (before periods start)that girls sghould not be expected to bare their bottom for punishment. After all at this age they are still but children. After 11 they are more young ladies. The closer we move towards 1980 the more this ios the case. With these young children, I do not see why it is any different for a girl to have punishment on the bare bottom than a boy.
Slippering for ‘Fun’.11
Related Articles
-
Corporal Punishment The Anticipation of5
The anticipation was indeed dreadful, making you wait was an art form in itself and when the time...
-
Catholic School in New England20
The floorboards felt gritty underneath my knees, and the dust made me want to sneeze. Then a new fear...
-
Did the Cane Hurt as Much as you Thought20
Even if it was true that you had done something that could be construed as violent – and...
-
Spying in the bushes2
Amanda and I couldn’t believe our luck. We stifled our giggles, so as to not give our position away,...
-
Punishment in Instalments27
When we were at school, we had a strict PE teacher. I ended up with having to do many...
-
Receiving Corporal Punishment as an Adult out of Curiosity35
I was interested in the account of the boy who benefitted from a caning, not I suspect, in the...
-
Pupils in a Class of their Own for Bad Behaviour19
my primary schooling was 1954–57 in the infants school, and 1957–1961 in the junior school. Take the teacher we...
-
Cane Marks28
Two strokes are usualy gone in a day or two-three at most. Four possibly a week but no more....