Mr. Evans, in his defence, denied liability, and said that it was a term of the contract between himself and the parents of boys that he might administer corporal punishment if he considered it in a boy’s best interest. On March 9, 1944, the boy stuck a fellow pupil in the face with a piece of metal, injuring him, and it was agreed between him (Mr. Evans) and Mrs. Feldman, Peter’s mother, that he should administer corporal punishment to Peter if inquiry showed that there was no sufficient provocation for his assault on the other boy. Mr. Evans admitted that, having found that there was no sufficient provocation, he gave Peter six strokes on the naked buttocks with a flat rubber instrument about 17 1/2 inches long, 2 1/2 inches wide, and 1/4 inch thick, and that in the course of that punishment, the boy sustained slight grazes of the upper right leg, and he pleaded that the punishment was reasonable and was justifiably and moderately administered.
Caning from of the Times13
-
Why Corporal Punishment Has to Had to Go79
In the South the issue is intimately bound up in cultural and religious identity, and ties in with the...
-
Corporal Punishment & The Gender Disadvantage79
I would expect it to be used in the majority of cases to be so considered – not the...
-
The Slipper in UK Schools24
“If I had attended King’s school during the period you were there I’m not sure how I would have...
-
Miss Ross & her Methods of Discipline1
Miss Ross was a strict disciplinarian, a kind but firm presence in the classroom. She would never raise her...
-
Smoking1
Did anyone get punished for smoking at school? I received six of the belt, it was agony. We used...
-
Disciplined by Brenda6
Next, I felt the leather being measured across my rear. Brenda gave a little grunt and brought the belt...
-
Fooling Around5
In the coming weeks, Mrs B spanked me twice more and I began to enjoy her dominant manner. Then...
-
Caned in 1984
I was collecting one of my grandsons from his private school in London . I went into the school...