The Divisional Court upon these facts said that they were not satisfied that the writ was served first and the paper issued afterwards, and they accordingly dismissed the motion without costs. Mr. Justice Darling, however, said that the Court believed that the statements in the newspaper had been issued for the purpose of influencing the public in some way, and that Mr. Conolly must not repeat the statement complained of, and his counsel stated that Mr. Conolly had no intention of repeating them, and undertook not to do so during the pendency of the actions. Nothing happened until September last, when a statement was made in Mr. Conolly’s paper which was ignored by Dr. Keats, but in November there began to be a repetition of the statements complained of.
Caning from of the Times40
Related Articles
-
The Headmaster’s Study5
Of course, the other boy then attacked me from behind, and what had been a playful tease on their...
-
School Belt17
Anyway, back to the subject matter. I suppose when I think about it that I probably witnessed no more...
-
School CP’s Little Secret69
I don’t personally know anyone of my generation, or even a younger one, who considered that they were somehow...
-
Corporal Punishment & The Cricket Bat 2
The man he asked to undertake this pleasant duty at first declinced thinking it was in jest. However, when...
-
Spanking as Punishment in India3
Yes. Here. Handbooks attests to the administration of corporal punishment over the knee in Christian schools. Since spanking is...
-
Lack of Discipline1
Once again my morning TV viewing was alive with reports of school children ‘out of control’ or just plain...
-
Discipline & Rupert Bear1
I don’t know if Rupert Bear is an internationally known cartoon character but he has appeared in the Daily...
-
The Cane in UK Schools43
Bacon’s used CP with both sexes so a higher-than-average rate can be expected. Interestingly, more boys than girls were...