British Medical Journal, 16 February 1935
Correspondence
It is impossible to believe that the medical department of the Board has not formed any opinion on a medical question so obviously affecting the health of the school child, and it seems to me to be very curious that when so many memoranda and annual reports are written there should be none on corporal punishment. Are we to conclude from the reply of the Parliamentary Secretary that when a county medical officer refers the medical questions to the medical department of the Board he is told that he must decide the questions for himself? Or are we to conclude that advice is given but must not be disclosed?SIR, — In the House of Commons on February 5th the Parliamentary Secretary to the Board of Education was asked whether he was now prepared to accept the suggestion that an official opinion should be pronounced on the medical aspect of the caning of girls, for the guidance of all local education authorities. Mr. Ramsbotham replied that corporal punishment had always been regarded as within the discretion of the school authorities, and that his Noble Friend did not see any reason to vary that policy. The views of the Board of Education are set out in the paragraph on discipline in the Handbook of Suggestions for Teachers, and the relevant sentences were quoted on page 1178 of the British Medical Journal of December 22nd, 1934. There can be no doubt that the Board intends to convey in these sentences its view that girls should not be caned by men. But some education committees give authority to men to cane girls. Such disregard of the views of the Board can only be justified if it is shown, either that the girls in, for example, the West Riding of Yorkshire, are much more obstreperous than the girls in, for example, London; or that the teachers in the West Riding are so weak that they cannot control normal girls. Either supposition is fantastic. There can be no doubt that the views of the Board are disregarded by some education committees, and that if the caning of girls is to be stopped it will be necessary for the Board to make a rule to that effect. That is to say, Sir, the policy of the Board will have to be altered. — I am, etc., R. L. KITCHING. Wetherby, Feb. 10th.
The Caning of Girls
-
Caning in Public Schools
The Times, London, 8 February 1910 . A case of no little interest to schoolmasters and parents was...
-
Equality at Eton
Daily Mail, London, 9 January 1912, p.5 Inquiries at Eton show that Lord Ossulston was there for one term...
-
“The Rod and the Child”
Belfast News-Letter, 30 March 1930 Ulster House of Commons Power to Cane Boys in Borstal Institution. The Minister of...
-
An Eton Mystery
The Marlborough Express, New Zealand, 26 November 1907, p.6 . Etonians all over the world will learn with surprise...
-
Use of the School Cane.
Daily Mail, London, 4 November 1907, p.6 A Principal Exonerated. The adjourned summons against Mr. William Gannon, M.A., principal...
-
Chastising Schoolboys.
Daily Mail, London, 8 May 1903 “It is news to me,” remarked the magistrate, “that a schoolmaster may not...
-
Corporal Punishment
March 1907 Statement Issued by Mr. Paton. Click to enlarge We have received the following copy of a letter...
-
Punishment of boy: Action against headmaster fails
The Times, London, 19 October 1945 High Court of Justice: King’s Bench Division Feldman v. Evans; before Mr. Justice...