The trial proper took place in May, 1953; the Prosecution urged that Wildman was guilty of obscene libel in publishing pamphlets of whose detailed nature the general public had naturally no precise knowledge. Here we can but list some of the titles of works to which objection was taken: A Girl’s Beating; Punishment Postures (with illustrations); and so forth. The presence of illustrations seemed to reinforce the Prosecution’s standpoint. All this despite the fact that several of these pamphlets had prefaces from the pens of clergymen in Glasgow and elsewhere; such a defence availed nought.
Chastisement Across the Ages29
-
Mrs Wilkins111
As they reached the bottom, he noticed the same old straight-backed chair resting against the wall. By the time...
-
Enjoyable Canings10
Secondly on the issue of why teach. Of course, you have to do it for the students, and that...
-
How Would you Rate your Schools Punishments30
Could it possibly work the other way? If a boy and a girl were caught committing some offence together...
-
Two of the Three R’s in 1956 9
There was one aspect of the grammar school regime that was designed to provide positive encouragement in academic work....
-
School Corporal Punishment History93
Professor H. M. Andrew certainly enhanced his reputation in the eyes of the stern parents who thought he was...
-
Corporal Punisment Memories School42
I don’t think there is any respect in not doing what you believe will benefit a student. In fact...
-
Purposeful Corporal Punishment28
When I was in the first form, the woodwork master punished latecomers with a couple of whacks on the...
-
Another perspective of School Caning6
The boy demonstrates it in a scene from the play where he is beating the hands of a group...