I take your point about the variation in the amount of protection different skirts provide – it’s much greater than the variation in the thickness of different trousers. That can justify requiring skirts to be lifted (regardless of the sex of the wearer) which, in turn, can justify a lighter caning. There is still an unfairness if trouser wearers can be punished immediately in class but skirt wearers have to wait (knowing their fate) to be punished in private later. Punishing both in class would be unfair to skirt wearers because of the added embarrassment so it would be fairer to punish trouser wearers in private too. In that case, however, they could also be caned on their knickers/underpants so your justification for caning skirt wearers (or girls in general) more lightly has gone.
SCHOOL CORPORAL PUNISHMENT12
Related Articles
-
Learning How to Discipline1
Summer was coming and Penny needed a babysitter quickly, for there would be no one home to take care...
-
Corporal Punishment in the Sixties3
As someone who was 14 years of age at the time of the “Woodstock” pop concert which is supposed...
-
Corporal Punishment References from Buy Gone Days17
It was possible that I might never be presented with a good enough excuse to wallop her backside as...
-
Corporal Punishment in Mixed Secondary Modern22
So this brings me to question two. In my opinion Scottish women are more likely to mention the belt than...
-
School Punishment Book59
I like the precision of 1 stroke for every foot over three feet climbed up a tree, that would...
-
Cane Marks29
The longest period of time that cane marks lasted on my bottom was five days. It was after my...
-
Delay before punishment4
the grave announcement comes to my study at such and such a time when you will receive CP, such...
-
Tall (but true) story5
The three of us were left alone in the room. The girls had stopped giggling and the taller of...