–in junior school, I think it is just acceptable if no other options were open. I DO NOT SEE WHY AT THE AGE OF 9 OR 10 (before periods start)that girls sghould not be expected to bare their bottom for punishment. After all at this age they are still but children. After 11 they are more young ladies. The closer we move towards 1980 the more this ios the case. With these young children, I do not see why it is any different for a girl to have punishment on the bare bottom than a boy.
Slippering for ‘Fun’.11
Related Articles
-
Girls slippered in front of boys5
On the other hand, girls were punished only rarely. I once overheard a boy ask if girls got the...
-
To Tawse or not to Tawse11
They did not need to. Gym shorts do not provide much protection if your bottom was the intended target...
-
Why Corporal Punishment Has to / Had to Go43
I think that type of teaching is a 150 years out of date, when educators could claim “I...
-
A Stroke of Respectability2
But among parents themselves, I would say that an even greater impulse was the somewhat desperate urge to...
-
A Run Up to Corporal Punishment2
The p.e master was furious and ordered us all into the gym informing us that the two boys were...
-
Bullying & Corporal Punishment6
Corporal Punishment is still legal in America, the only industrialized nation on the planet where it is in fact still...
-
Supermarket Weep4
A photo my cousin took through the keyhole of the study at Samuel Southalls School in Worcester may be...
-
School CP’s Little Secret33
If you treat a child unfairly you’re highly likely to cause resentment and do considerable harm. Even if you...