I also have to say that maybe the scene in question might be of relevance to some other discussions here. I would point out that in 1961, Walt Disney and his company apparently saw absolutely nothing wrong with the underpants clad bottom of a 15 year old girl (Hayley’s age – the character was 13) being displayed all over the world for all to see. Apparently nor did Hayley’s parents, nor did millions of filmgoers as far as I can tell. It’s a very popular film and I haven’t often heard much controversy about the underwear being visible. So in that case, why should we be incredulous about the idea that a school teacher might have had any hesitation about exposing a girl in that way?
Tawse Protection Clothing10
Related Articles
-
Corporal Punishment & Slipper Sizes4
At a mass slippering for messing about in the changing rooms about 8 of us were lined up in...
-
CP behind the Iron Curtain2
The belt is normally given for the same reasons as elsewhere: disobedience, (an increasing problem since the fall of...
-
Mrs Wilkins15
Because the swats were more symbolic than painful, Billy experienced a familiar sense of safety, protection, and submission he...
-
School Discipline References25
the caning scene in Kes, in which you will see the headmaster using the wrist gripping technique. This is...
-
Dreams and Awakenings15
As Carlton vainly twisted his hips and kicked his legs, Nantessa cheerfully walloped his plump, rapidly-reddening rear end with...
-
School Punishment Book111
But that was not the case, because nearly all of the teachers used classroom CP, and I have no...
-
Enjoyable Canings11
I’ve argued this before and I hope not ad nauseum. Perhaps it would be best to put the category...
-
Caning from of the Times33
Do you know that there is something more terrible than flagellation of the body – flagellation of the mind?...