So my objection to Dr. Sax was not that he doesn’t have some valuable insight yes he does, but that he reinforces the dominant Judeo-Christian ethic of the inviolability of womanhood, as an ideological and social device, intended to divide and separate the sexes for a variety of reasons ranging from religious -ideological and socio-sexual taboos to the effective deployment of knowledge. This is why, of course, the Christian Right salutes him!
He does this by methodologically separating the continuum of sexual differentiation, into two discrete categories each with its own social symbolism, and ideology, represented by differential pedagogy and communication and discipline.