Tom Brown was supposed to be about Dr Arnold’s time at Rugby in the early 19th Century. The cane wasn’t introduced until around 1880. The reason it replaced the birch was purely because the prudish Victorians felt it was ‘improper’ to make boys lower their trousers and the cane could be administered without that need. It was considered just as painful across the trousers as the birch was across the bare backside and in no way was it brought in to lesson the severity of corporal punishment in schools. Unhappily for many boys, the cane was often still applied across the bare buttocks even up to the 1930’s and possibly beyond that time.
Tom Brown’s schooldays2
Related Articles
-
Corporal Punishment References133
St Dominics Secondary Liverpool Jackie any girlies ever had the cain off ms walsh or ms lamb ?? that...
-
Caning from of the Times45
Mr. McCall, K.C. and Mr. Neilson appeared for the plaintiff; the first two defendants appeared in person; and Mr....
-
Caned in Numbers2
Peterborough was distinctive, the school had since its opening in 1901 always housed both girls and boys, but for...
-
Slippered Together5
I recall pupils (boys) being threatened with being sent to Mr Smith (Headmaster) for the strap but don’t really...
-
Purposeful Corporal Punishment20
Interesting that these anecdotes point up what we all know – that corporal punishment had (has?) distinctly differing “levels”...
-
School Corporal Punishment The Pros and cons of4
Is CP too cruel? I wonder. When I was at school many boys would rather have had a few...
-
Discipline at Work13
“Come here,” she commanded as she brandished the brush. He did as he was told. She spread her legs...
-
Caning from of the Times28
EVIDENCE OF DR. KEATS. Dr. Keats said he had been medical superintendent of the Camberwell Infirmary for 15 1/2...